Skip to content
My Biggest Script Failure (and what it taught me)

My Biggest Script Failure (and what it taught me)

28 January 2026 BY: Nicola Berry
#post-mortem#error-handling#webhooks#reliability

Status: Post-Mortem / Lessons Learned

Subject: The Day the Webhooks Wouldn’t Stop

We have all had that one “nightmare” project. For me, it was a bespoke integration between a high-traffic lead generator and a client’s CRM. On paper, the logic was sound. In practice, it turned into a digital avalanche that nearly crashed the client’s entire sales pipeline.

It wasn’t a syntax error or a “wrong” line of code that caused the failure. It was something much more subtle: a logic loop that turned a single lead into a recursive storm of data.


The Breakdown: The Infinite Loop

The system was designed to be “helpful.” When a lead came in, an Apps Script would format the data and push it to the CRM. The CRM was then set to “ping” back a confirmation via a webhook.

The failure happened because the confirmation ping triggered the script again. Within seconds, the script was caught in an infinite loop. For every one lead that arrived, the system generated thousands of “confirmations.” My inbox started screaming with API quota alerts, and the client’s CRM was slowing to a crawl under the weight of ten thousand duplicate entries.


The Debugging Process: Finding the “Why”

When a system is failing that fast, your first instinct is to panic and start changing code. But debugging is about discipline, not speed. I had to kill the triggers immediately to stop the bleeding, and then I went looking for the “fingerprints.”

By diving into the execution logs, I saw the pattern. Every execution was being triggered by the same “User-Agent” as the CRM. The system was essentially talking to itself in a mirror and getting confused by the reflection.

The fix wasn’t complicated—I added a simple “Handshake” check. I told the script: “If the incoming data has a ‘Processed’ flag already, or if the source is our own CRM confirmed ID, ignore it and stop.”


Why Error-Handling is More Important Than the Code

This failure taught me a humbling lesson: Your primary job isn’t to make the code work; it is to manage how the code fails.

A script that works perfectly 99% of the time but “nukes” the server during the 1% failure is a bad script. Since that day, I have approached every Empower Automation project with a “Fail-Safe First” mentality.

We now build in what I call “The Circuit Breaker.” It is a small piece of logic that monitors how many times a script has run in the last sixty seconds. If it exceeds a certain threshold, the script “trips” itself and shuts down. It is better for a client to miss five minutes of data than to have their entire system crash under a million recursive hits.


The Verdict

Failure is the best teacher in the world of automation. It forces you to move away from “Happy Path” coding and into the realm of resilient, professional-grade engineering.

I don’t regret that failure. It led to the robust error-handling frameworks we use today—the ones that ensure your business stays quiet and stable, even when the APIs are acting up.

If your current automation feels like it is “held together with string,” maybe it’s time we built you a proper circuit breaker.

Google Workspace

Professional Email & Tools for Your Business

Get you@yourcompany.com, plus video meetings, secure cloud storage, and the powerful admin controls you need to scale. Same tools I use to build your automations.

Custom business email
Secure file sharing & collaboration
Security and management controls